Stormy Daniels’ lawyer — Michael Avenatti — continues to put his client at risk of a large judgment, and even worse, at risk for criminal charges, for either her or him. Two minutes of fame can be very expensive.
Read MoreOn Thursday, three days before CBS’ “60 Minutes” aired an interview with adult film star Stormy Daniels about her alleged 2006 sexual encounter with Donald Trump and the alleged threats to keep quiet about it, her attorney tweeted a mysterious picture of a CD or DVD.
Read MoreSessions' recusal does not prevent Sessions from removing Mueller's power over non-collusion cases that do not concern the 2016 campaign. Indeed, the Constitution compels Sessions limit Mueller.
Read MoreCNN’s Jake Tapper, and many other pundits, assert there is “no evidence” to support Trump’s belief about a large number of illegal votes cast in the election.
Read MoreDoes anyone doubt that foreign government officials purchased books published by Barack Obama? My goodness, did Obama violate the emoluments clause? That is the extraordinary and unprecedented application of law a group of liberal lawyers masquerading as “ethics” lawyers (where were they during the Clinton Foundation?) urges in their proposed suit to be filed against President Trump today.
Read MoreGloria Allred’s suit against Trump may be good for TMZ (and her publicity), but not so good for a courtroom (and her client). And, given that TMZ once compared my legal pleadings to “Shakespeare,” I harbor no ill will toward TMZ. The biggest problem Allred’s client faces is she may end up with a dismissed suit and stuck with Trump’s legal bill.
Read MoreLiberals can thank a Kennedy-hating law pushed by LBJ for the limits on presidential powers to hire familial relations. Liberals can also thank the Clintons for making White House staff exempt from that law.
Read MoreWhat happens if, on December 19, more than three-dozen Trump electors abandon their pledges, their party and their promises, and vote for Hillary instead of Trump? Is that it? Election over? Coup finished?
Read MoreA Texas elector just publicly stated in The New York Times his intention to vote against the party nominee of the party that elected him to the electoral college.
Read More